Working Together 2026 — What Changed for Police
Working Together to Safeguard Children 2026 (WT2026) was published on 18 March 2026, replacing the 2023 edition, and refined how police work within multi-agency safeguarding. The headline changes affecting police operational practice are:
Key changes for referral practice
- Multi-Agency Safeguarding Arrangements (MASA). WT2026 sharpens the roles of the three statutory safeguarding partners — police, the local authority and the integrated care board (ICB) — and adds a duty to evidence improved outcomes for children, not just follow process.
- Family Help — a single front-door offer. Targeted early help and Section 17 child-in-need support are merged into a multi-disciplinary "Family Help" offer. Police intelligence that does not meet a criminal threshold should still be shared to inform Family Help.
- Serious incident notifications even where the child is unknown. A Serious Incident Notification must now be submitted even when the child's identity is not yet known, and must consider the wider family and other children at risk. The Rapid Review must follow within 15 working days of the notification.
- Contextual Safeguarding remains central. Police must contribute intelligence about the contexts of harm (locations, peer groups, online environments) as well as family-based indicators. See Section 2 below.
- Stronger emphasis on multi-agency working from first contact. WT2026 expects police to engage with local MASH arrangements proactively — not only when a crime is suspected. Safeguarding intelligence that does not meet a criminal threshold should still be shared.
- Child-in-need threshold clarified. A child can be referred as a "child in need" (s.17 Children Act 1989) even where abuse is not confirmed — welfare concerns are sufficient. Police should not wait for confirmation of abuse before referring.
- Section 47 (child protection) threshold unchanged — reasonable cause to suspect significant harm. But WT2026 makes explicit that extra-familial harm (exploitation, peer violence, online abuse) can constitute the source of significant harm triggering a s.47 enquiry.
- Lead professional model strengthened. Where a child has multiple professionals involved, WT2026 emphasises clarity on who is the lead professional. For exploitation cases with both police and social care involvement, agree lead professional early in a joint strategy discussion.
UK GDPR, Article 6(1)(e) and the Data Protection Act 2018 both permit the disclosure of personal data where it is necessary for the performance of a public task and in the public interest. Child safeguarding referrals meet this test. Where a referral is urgent and involves risk to life, the common law duty of care independently permits disclosure. Data protection law is not a barrier to safeguarding referrals.
Contextual Safeguarding — What It Means for Police
Contextual Safeguarding (developed by Prof Carlene Firmin, Bedfordshire University) is an approach that recognises children can be harmed in contexts beyond the family home — by peers, in public spaces, online, and through gang or criminal networks. WT2026 adopts this framework and requires safeguarding partners (including police) to assess and intervene in these wider contexts.
Practical implications for police referrals
- Location matters. When referring a child, include intelligence about the specific location where harm is occurring — a particular park, street corner, residential address, or online platform. MASH need this to coordinate a contextual response.
- Peer group intelligence. Identify and share (appropriately) intelligence about the peer group surrounding the child — not just the child themselves. A vulnerable child in an exploitative peer group can be safeguarded more effectively if the group is mapped.
- Online contexts are covered. Harm occurring primarily or entirely online (grooming, sextortion, drill music threats) is within scope of Contextual Safeguarding and should be included in referrals.
- Gang territory is a context. A child who lives within the territorial geography of a gang, even without direct gang involvement, may be experiencing contextual risk. Include postcode-level intelligence where relevant.
- School environment. If a child's school is a context of harm — bullying, exploitation, or radicalisation occurring in or around school — include this. The DSL should be part of the multi-agency response (see Resource 08).
Contextual Safeguarding is about identifying harmful contexts that affect children, not about targeting specific communities or groups. Intelligence sharing must be proportionate and have a clear safeguarding purpose. Sharing community-level intelligence without a link to a specific child at risk should be discussed with your safeguarding supervisor before referral.
Extra-Familial Harm — WT2026 Definitions
WT2026 uses the term extra-familial harm to describe harm to children that occurs primarily outside the family home. This is a statutory term — police should use it in referral documentation to ensure MASH respond using the appropriate framework.
| Category | WT2026 Definition / Scope | Police Referral Indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Child Criminal Exploitation (CCE) | Child manipulated or coerced into committing criminal activity for the benefit of a third party; includes county lines, cuckooing, drug running, and gang activity | Child found at cuckooed address; found OT; knife or drugs found; known gang associate; NRM indicators |
| Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE) | Sexual activity in exchange for something (including material, emotional, or social benefits) where consent is absent or coerced; may involve individual or organised abuse | Relationship with controlling older partner; unexplained gifts; found at unknown residential address; online grooming progression to meeting |
| Serious Violence | Gang-related violence, peer-on-peer assault, knife crime as a form of contextual harm to children — not limited to the child as offender | Child is victim of gang violence; threats received; fearful about route to school; online drill scoresheet implicating them |
| Online Harm | Grooming, sexual exploitation, radicalisation, and abuse occurring through digital platforms; Online Safety Act 2023 creates additional context | CEOP disclosure; IIOC found; child distressed by online contact; sextortion indicators |
| Peer-on-Peer Abuse | Abuse perpetrated by a child's peer group, including sexual harassment, cyberbullying, upskirting, and coercive sexual activity | Report from school; victim unwilling to attend school; sexual images shared within peer group; assault within peer group |
| Radicalisation / Prevent | Exploitation of a child by extremist networks; process and influence of radicalisation is a form of extra-familial harm | Channel referral by school; extremist material found; sudden ideological shift; known extremist associate contact |
MASH Referral Decision Flowchart
Where you decide not to make a MASH referral, you must record the rationale in the intelligence log and on the CAD/incident record. "No safeguarding concern identified" is not sufficient — explain what indicators were absent and why the threshold was not met. This protects you and creates an audit trail if the situation escalates.
Information to Gather Before Referring
A MASH referral is significantly more useful to social care when it contains structured information. Gather the following before or immediately after calling.
- Child's details: full name, DOB, gender, address, school, ethnicity, any known disabilities or EHC plan
- Parent/carer details: name, relationship, contact number; any known concerns about parenting capacity
- Current concern: specific incident or pattern triggering the referral; what you saw or were told; direct quotes from the child where possible
- Contextual information (WT2026 requirement): location where harm occurred or is occurring; peer group or associates involved; online platform if relevant
- Extra-familial harm category (CCE, CSE, peer abuse, etc.) if applicable
- Other agencies already involved: social worker, EDT, school DSL, LAC team, IDVA, CAMHS
- Your assessment of immediate risk: is the child currently safe? Is the parent/carer a risk factor?
- Actions already taken: NRM referral, arrest, removal under s.46 PPO, EDT contacted